Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


Google

WWW
http://www.hillbillyreport.org/
"Never before have so few with so much promised to take away so much from so many and then laugh their asses off as the so many with so little vote for the so few with so much."
A James Pence Quote
"American Politics, a sport for the rich and enslavement for the rest of us."
A James Pence Quote

The Robust Public Choice Made Simple

by: BruceMcF

Sat Sep 12, 2009 at 11:22:23 AM EDT


Burning the Midnight Oil for the Next American Revolution, also available in orange

From some online dictionary somewhere:

Robustness is the quality of being able to withstand stresses, pressures, or changes in procedure or circumstance

So: (1) Public Choice

"No Taxation without Representation". Every single person facing an individual mandate must be provided with the choice of a publicly administered plan. Otherwise the government is forcing the citizen to pay without the elected representatives of the citizen controlling the spending.

You want to put a trigger on the public option. Fine, except the exact same trigger applies to the individual mandate.

You want to restrict access to the public option to some smaller group? Fine, except the same restriction applies to the individual mandate.

The system is not politically legitimate if it requires payment to for-profit commercial corporations.

(2) Robust

It cannot be lumbered down with any restrictions not faced by private insurers.

State by state public options? Really? You are really prepared to restrict the corporations to firms with no commercial activity across state lines? If they are free standing state by state public options, it has to be state by state for profit corporations. Oh, not allowing UHC into the exchanges defeats the purpose of lining private pockets at the public expense? Yeah, kind of thought so.

BruceMcF :: The Robust Public Choice Made Simple
The hard question is how to accomplish it. It would seem that it is necessary for the House Bill to include language that specifically states that the public choice does not face any restrictions not faced by commercial corporations with plans in the exchange, and explicit language that nobody can be subject to a mandate unless they have access to the public choice.

With that language in there, a conference report stripping it out would require a provision doing the dirty work. That provision could be struck by the House when the conferees report.

That is, a conference report included the laundry list of amendments to each sides bill to make them the same bill, and while no new amendments can be offered, AFAIU, a chamber has the right to strike a provision.

That might result in a second conference, but so be it: it seems highly likely that the Senate conferees will not believe that the House progressive caucus will really, truly stand up for what were, after all, the very first "progressive" principles in our history as a nation-state - until they, in fact, do so.

Midnight Oil "Dreamworld" video

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

You heard it hear first ... (4.00 / 1)
... I gussied it up a bit to crosspost to the Midnight Oil blog, and then backported the changes here. I'll be crossposting this around the blogosphere through the day.

The Words of the Prophets
  Are Written on the Subway Walls
    And Tenement Halls


You betcha (4.00 / 4)
nobody can be subject to a mandate unless they have access to the public choice.


©"Never before have so few with so much promised to take away so much from so many and then laugh their asses off as the so many with so little vote for the so few with so much."
A James Pence Quote



Clickheretop640

About
About Us
Our Videos
Community Guidelines
Contact Us
Diary Formatting Tips

Subscribe to HBR by email
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Subscribe in a reader


Blog Roll

 

free hit
counters

Active Users
Currently 0 user(s) logged on.

Powered by: SoapBlox